Vatic Note: If you read the Constitution on this issue, you will find that the founding fathers intended that only profit making businesses were to pay taxes, except in time of war, then everyone pays. For regular non war taxation, they never intended for a working man paid by another should pay taxes and the reason was that the founding fathers considered "wages" as an "exchange of assets" and not a source of profit such as a business would generate.
The mans' labor was his asset and the pay he received was not considered income, rather it was considered an asset of the person who hired him and they exchanged assets. Now "THAT" makes perfect sense. If a man gives up something he owns, like his labor, in exchange for another asset that he can use, then there is "no profit" in the transaction. Rather, its a bartering system.
This income tax issue became a controversy because the central banks were trying to take control of the US currency, banking and interest accumulation through amassing of debt by the country and its government. The IRS in reality, is an arm of the World Bank and the IMF, as their collection arm.
Notice that our budgets are NEVER based on tax revenues, they are based on debt, since all budgets are first borrowed and then paid back by tax revenues, and its the interest that is paid first, with the principle last, which means we never get out of debt and the bankers get rich off of our labor asset exchange, being taxed as income.
Thats why the IRS headquarters are based out of Puerto Rico. Anyway, this is a great collection of legal renderings that proves the point about the issue of failure to file taxes. No law exists because it was never in the Constitution that labor should be taxed as income. You read and see what you think.
CHIEF JUSTICE ADMITS NO FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX LAW EXISTS !
http://thedailycoin.org/?p=59108
By Mike Rivero, Whats Really Happening
In Sullivan vs United States, Judge James C. Fox admitted in the court record that the 16th (income tax) Amendment failed to be ratified, then goes on to admit that judges all know this, but pretend the 16th Amendment is the law of the land, because their salaries, court rooms, staff, and those robes are all bought with money taken from the American people.
TDC Note – This is a bit of a challenge to read but well worth the effort. As our once proud nation continues to stumble and fall this could be one of the more important pieces of information to challenge the oligarchs and their reign of financial terror.
from APFN
I pledge allegiance to the States & the flag for which it stands , united as
if one nation, under God, w/equal Liberty & equal Justice for all.
“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged
sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by
partiotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”–Julius
Caesar.
Source: From Paralegals: paralegals@prodigy.net
It can all be found here:
http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/2001/january.html#00-1831
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/00-1831.pd
f
Read all of page 5 & 6, lines 9 thru 24 of the oral argument!
Read the case here:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1831.ZS.html
In the transcript of the Oral Argument:
He (Chief Justice Rhenquist) and the United States attorney (Kent
Jones) admit there is NO statute (LAW) that makes it a crime for “failure to
file” an income tax return!
QUOTE: “I’m not familiar with a statute that makes that a crime
by itself” …”but the fact that you didn’t file…frankly…it’s my
impression that that would not by itself be a crime”.
..then it says on pg. 6 lines 20-25 of the transcript, Chief
Justice of the United States Supreme Court William Rhenquist said:
“We’d better not let the word get out”…”We’ll keep it just
among ourselves”… and they have the nerve to laugh about it! The attorney
then defers all Title 18 (??) questions to Justice Kennedy.
UNITED STATES V. CRAFT (00-1831) Web-accessible at:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1831.ZS.html
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. SANDRA
L. CRAFT No. 00 1831
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Stevens and Justice
Scalia join, dissenting. “That the federal tax lien did not attach to the
Grand Rapids property is further supported by the consensus among the lower
courts. For more than 50 years, every federal court reviewing tenancies by the entirety in States with a similar understanding of tenancy by the entirety as Michigan has concluded that a federal tax lien cannot attach to such property to
satisfy an individual spouses tax liability.8
This consensus is supported by the IRS consistent recognition, arguably against its own interest, that a federal tax lien against one spouse cannot attach to property or rights to property held as a tenancy by the entirety.9”
Footnote 8: See IRS v. Gaster, 42 F.3d 787, 791 (CA3 1994) (concluding that
the IRS is not entitled to a lien on property owned as a tenancy by the
entirety to satisfy the tax obligations of one spouse); Pitts v. United
States, 946 F.2d 1569, 1571 1572 (CA4 1991) (same); United States v. American Nat. Bank of Jacksonville, 255 F.2d 504, 507 (CA5), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 (1958)
(same);
Raffaele v. Granger, 196 F.2d 620, 622 623 (CA3 1952) (same);
United States v. Hutcherson, 188 F.2d 326, 331 (CA8 1951) (explaining that
the interest of one spouse in tenancy by the entirety property is not a
right to property or property in any sense ); United States v. Nathanson, 60
F. Supp. 193, 194 (ED Mich. 1945)
(finding no designation in the Federal Revenue Act for imposing
tax upon property held by the entirety for taxes due from one person alone);
Shaw v. United States, 94 F. Supp. 245, 246 (WD Mich. 1939) (recognizing
that the nature of the estate under Michigan law precludes the tax lien from attaching to tenancy by the entirety property for the tax liability of one spouse). See also Benson v. United States, 442 F.2d 1221, 1223 (CADC 1971) (recognizing the Government's concession that property owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety cannot be subjected to a tax lien for the debt of one tenant); Cole v.
Cardoza, 441 F.2d 1337, 1343 (CA6 1971) (noting Government concession that,
under Michigan law, it had no valid claim against real property held by
tenancy by the entirety).
Footnote 9: See, e.g., Internal Revenue Manual º5.8.4.2.3 (RIA
2002), available at WESTLAW, RIA IRM database (Mar. 29, 2002) (listing
property owned as tenants by the entirety as among the assets beyond the
reach of the Government’s tax lien); id., º5.6.1.2.3 (recognizing that a
consensual lien may be appropriate when the federal tax lien does not attach
to the property in question. For example, an assessment exists against only
one spouse and the federal tax lien does not attach to real property held as tenants by the entirety. );
IRS Chief Counsel Advisory (Aug. 17, 2001) (noting that consensual liens,
or mortgages, are to be used as a means of securing the Government s right
to collect from property the assessment lien does not attach to, such as
real property held as a tenancy by the entirety (emphasis added)); IRS
Litigation Bulletin No. 407 (Aug. 1994)
(Traditionally, the government has taken the view that a federal
tax lien against a single debtor-spouse does not attach to property or
rights to property held by both spouses as tenants by the entirety. ); IRS
Litigation Bulletin No. 388 (Jan. 1993) (explaining that neither the
Department of Justice nor IRS chief counsel interpreted United States v.
Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 (1983), to mean that a federal tax lien against one
spouse encumbers his or her interest in entireties property, and noting that it do[es] not believe the Department will again argue the broader interpretation
of Rodgers, which would extend the reach of the federal tax lien to property
held by the entireties); Benson, supra, at 1223; Cardoza, supra, et 1343.
ICE – Investigating Curious Evidence http://iresist.com/ice/ice@iresist.com
We have a Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) that
makes us free. Right? Then visit:
http://www.trimonline.org http://www.getusout.org
http://www.thenewamerican.com http://www.givemeliberty.org
http://www.jbs.org
Then take a look at these sites:
http://www.dixierising.com
http://www.dixienet.org http://www.palmetto.org
http://www.southerncaucus.org http://www.spofga.org
http://www.southern-style.com http://www.nca.mybravenet.com
NOTE # 1: This is the THIRTY SIXTH doc in a string of about 39 regarding the
Income Tax, How it was illegally forced upon us, the collusion of various
nation banks, including The Bank of England, the Banks of Europe, the Banks of the USA that make up the Non-Government organization known as the Fed and the bankers themselves dedicated to making this a Socialist Nation.
As David Rockefeller reportedly said in 1973 when he and others formed the Trilateral Commission, “We will have this a Socialist Nation by the end of the year 2000.” Well, with the help of our past Communist President, he damned well nearly did it. If Comrade Gore had been elected, it would be now!
The last doc in this series is a plan that was presented to President Bush when he visited Florida. It was put directly into his hands. He has not
acted upon it. We The People must initiate a campaign of letters, faxes,
e-mails, and phone calls to him and others in our otherwise corrupt
government letting them know of our displeasure. For God and Country, Chet.
NOTE # 2: [ Should you wish to be removed from my mailing list, please
send a message with the word remove in the subject line. If you got this
from a mail list, such as xxxxxx@xxxxxgroups.com or something like that,
then it is up to the moderator or owner of the list to remove my access
based upon complaints of my material, abuse, or removal of your access if
you request it. ]
Should you wish a copy of a numbered message (this is the 36TH one) that you may have missed, please e-mail me off net for a copy of it and I will be very happy to provide it. Chet.
You may forward this to every member of Congress by using a Mail Blaster
application available on the Internet as follows:
Step 1. Access your web browser.
Step 2. Type in the search block:
http://www.mailblasterdot.com
Step 3. Click on Send Batch E-Mail which is on the left end of the
screen.
Step 4. Type in your E-mail Address.
Step 5. Click on Subject: Type in the subject of your document.
Step 6. Click on Message: Now here you can type in your message or you can
paste a previously copied file here. You can also edit your message after
you finish with the message and before sending it.
Step 7. Then click on select a file. Here you may click on:
demhouse.txt (Socialist Democrat House Members) or,
democsen.txt (Socialist Democrats Senate Members) or,
newsorg.txt (Many of the “anchor” news folks have their email address here
for you to use) or,
rephouse.txt (Republican House of Representatives Members) or,
repubsen.txt (Republican Senate Members) or,
senators.txt (All Senators).
Step 8. After selecting the group to receive your message then click on
send batch. It will go to everyone listed in the batch.
Remember: Nothing beats a letter AND a phone call.
A Chester L McWhorter Sr, 504 N. Brighton Rd, Lecanto, Florida. 34461. Ph:
352-344-9073. Fax: 352-344-9073. E-mail: robertthebruce@naturecoast.net
36 of 39… 100.1.5.1.0 End.
- See more at: http://thedailycoin.org/?p=59108#sthash.A8bODQmn.dpuf
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The mans' labor was his asset and the pay he received was not considered income, rather it was considered an asset of the person who hired him and they exchanged assets. Now "THAT" makes perfect sense. If a man gives up something he owns, like his labor, in exchange for another asset that he can use, then there is "no profit" in the transaction. Rather, its a bartering system.
This income tax issue became a controversy because the central banks were trying to take control of the US currency, banking and interest accumulation through amassing of debt by the country and its government. The IRS in reality, is an arm of the World Bank and the IMF, as their collection arm.
Notice that our budgets are NEVER based on tax revenues, they are based on debt, since all budgets are first borrowed and then paid back by tax revenues, and its the interest that is paid first, with the principle last, which means we never get out of debt and the bankers get rich off of our labor asset exchange, being taxed as income.
Thats why the IRS headquarters are based out of Puerto Rico. Anyway, this is a great collection of legal renderings that proves the point about the issue of failure to file taxes. No law exists because it was never in the Constitution that labor should be taxed as income. You read and see what you think.
CHIEF JUSTICE ADMITS NO FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX LAW EXISTS !
http://thedailycoin.org/?p=59108
By Mike Rivero, Whats Really Happening
In Sullivan vs United States, Judge James C. Fox admitted in the court record that the 16th (income tax) Amendment failed to be ratified, then goes on to admit that judges all know this, but pretend the 16th Amendment is the law of the land, because their salaries, court rooms, staff, and those robes are all bought with money taken from the American people.
TDC Note – This is a bit of a challenge to read but well worth the effort. As our once proud nation continues to stumble and fall this could be one of the more important pieces of information to challenge the oligarchs and their reign of financial terror.
from APFN
I pledge allegiance to the States & the flag for which it stands , united as
if one nation, under God, w/equal Liberty & equal Justice for all.
“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged
sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by
partiotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”–Julius
Caesar.
Source: From Paralegals: paralegals@prodigy.net
It can all be found here:
http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/2001/january.html#00-1831
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/00-1831.pd
f
Read all of page 5 & 6, lines 9 thru 24 of the oral argument!
Read the case here:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1831.ZS.html
In the transcript of the Oral Argument:
He (Chief Justice Rhenquist) and the United States attorney (Kent
Jones) admit there is NO statute (LAW) that makes it a crime for “failure to
file” an income tax return!
QUOTE: “I’m not familiar with a statute that makes that a crime
by itself” …”but the fact that you didn’t file…frankly…it’s my
impression that that would not by itself be a crime”.
..then it says on pg. 6 lines 20-25 of the transcript, Chief
Justice of the United States Supreme Court William Rhenquist said:
“We’d better not let the word get out”…”We’ll keep it just
among ourselves”… and they have the nerve to laugh about it! The attorney
then defers all Title 18 (??) questions to Justice Kennedy.
UNITED STATES V. CRAFT (00-1831) Web-accessible at:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1831.ZS.html
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. SANDRA
L. CRAFT No. 00 1831
Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Stevens and Justice
Scalia join, dissenting. “That the federal tax lien did not attach to the
Grand Rapids property is further supported by the consensus among the lower
courts. For more than 50 years, every federal court reviewing tenancies by the entirety in States with a similar understanding of tenancy by the entirety as Michigan has concluded that a federal tax lien cannot attach to such property to
satisfy an individual spouses tax liability.8
This consensus is supported by the IRS consistent recognition, arguably against its own interest, that a federal tax lien against one spouse cannot attach to property or rights to property held as a tenancy by the entirety.9”
Footnote 8: See IRS v. Gaster, 42 F.3d 787, 791 (CA3 1994) (concluding that
the IRS is not entitled to a lien on property owned as a tenancy by the
entirety to satisfy the tax obligations of one spouse); Pitts v. United
States, 946 F.2d 1569, 1571 1572 (CA4 1991) (same); United States v. American Nat. Bank of Jacksonville, 255 F.2d 504, 507 (CA5), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 (1958)
(same);
Raffaele v. Granger, 196 F.2d 620, 622 623 (CA3 1952) (same);
United States v. Hutcherson, 188 F.2d 326, 331 (CA8 1951) (explaining that
the interest of one spouse in tenancy by the entirety property is not a
right to property or property in any sense ); United States v. Nathanson, 60
F. Supp. 193, 194 (ED Mich. 1945)
(finding no designation in the Federal Revenue Act for imposing
tax upon property held by the entirety for taxes due from one person alone);
Shaw v. United States, 94 F. Supp. 245, 246 (WD Mich. 1939) (recognizing
that the nature of the estate under Michigan law precludes the tax lien from attaching to tenancy by the entirety property for the tax liability of one spouse). See also Benson v. United States, 442 F.2d 1221, 1223 (CADC 1971) (recognizing the Government's concession that property owned by the parties as tenants by the entirety cannot be subjected to a tax lien for the debt of one tenant); Cole v.
Cardoza, 441 F.2d 1337, 1343 (CA6 1971) (noting Government concession that,
under Michigan law, it had no valid claim against real property held by
tenancy by the entirety).
Footnote 9: See, e.g., Internal Revenue Manual º5.8.4.2.3 (RIA
2002), available at WESTLAW, RIA IRM database (Mar. 29, 2002) (listing
property owned as tenants by the entirety as among the assets beyond the
reach of the Government’s tax lien); id., º5.6.1.2.3 (recognizing that a
consensual lien may be appropriate when the federal tax lien does not attach
to the property in question. For example, an assessment exists against only
one spouse and the federal tax lien does not attach to real property held as tenants by the entirety. );
IRS Chief Counsel Advisory (Aug. 17, 2001) (noting that consensual liens,
or mortgages, are to be used as a means of securing the Government s right
to collect from property the assessment lien does not attach to, such as
real property held as a tenancy by the entirety (emphasis added)); IRS
Litigation Bulletin No. 407 (Aug. 1994)
(Traditionally, the government has taken the view that a federal
tax lien against a single debtor-spouse does not attach to property or
rights to property held by both spouses as tenants by the entirety. ); IRS
Litigation Bulletin No. 388 (Jan. 1993) (explaining that neither the
Department of Justice nor IRS chief counsel interpreted United States v.
Rodgers, 461 U.S. 677 (1983), to mean that a federal tax lien against one
spouse encumbers his or her interest in entireties property, and noting that it do[es] not believe the Department will again argue the broader interpretation
of Rodgers, which would extend the reach of the federal tax lien to property
held by the entireties); Benson, supra, at 1223; Cardoza, supra, et 1343.
ICE – Investigating Curious Evidence http://iresist.com/ice/ice@iresist.com
We have a Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) that
makes us free. Right? Then visit:
http://www.trimonline.org http://www.getusout.org
http://www.thenewamerican.com http://www.givemeliberty.org
http://www.jbs.org
Then take a look at these sites:
http://www.dixierising.com
http://www.dixienet.org http://www.palmetto.org
http://www.southerncaucus.org http://www.spofga.org
http://www.southern-style.com http://www.nca.mybravenet.com
NOTE # 1: This is the THIRTY SIXTH doc in a string of about 39 regarding the
Income Tax, How it was illegally forced upon us, the collusion of various
nation banks, including The Bank of England, the Banks of Europe, the Banks of the USA that make up the Non-Government organization known as the Fed and the bankers themselves dedicated to making this a Socialist Nation.
As David Rockefeller reportedly said in 1973 when he and others formed the Trilateral Commission, “We will have this a Socialist Nation by the end of the year 2000.” Well, with the help of our past Communist President, he damned well nearly did it. If Comrade Gore had been elected, it would be now!
The last doc in this series is a plan that was presented to President Bush when he visited Florida. It was put directly into his hands. He has not
acted upon it. We The People must initiate a campaign of letters, faxes,
e-mails, and phone calls to him and others in our otherwise corrupt
government letting them know of our displeasure. For God and Country, Chet.
NOTE # 2: [ Should you wish to be removed from my mailing list, please
send a message with the word remove in the subject line. If you got this
from a mail list, such as xxxxxx@xxxxxgroups.com or something like that,
then it is up to the moderator or owner of the list to remove my access
based upon complaints of my material, abuse, or removal of your access if
you request it. ]
Should you wish a copy of a numbered message (this is the 36TH one) that you may have missed, please e-mail me off net for a copy of it and I will be very happy to provide it. Chet.
You may forward this to every member of Congress by using a Mail Blaster
application available on the Internet as follows:
Step 1. Access your web browser.
Step 2. Type in the search block:
http://www.mailblasterdot.com
Step 3. Click on Send Batch E-Mail which is on the left end of the
screen.
Step 4. Type in your E-mail Address.
Step 5. Click on Subject: Type in the subject of your document.
Step 6. Click on Message: Now here you can type in your message or you can
paste a previously copied file here. You can also edit your message after
you finish with the message and before sending it.
Step 7. Then click on select a file. Here you may click on:
demhouse.txt (Socialist Democrat House Members) or,
democsen.txt (Socialist Democrats Senate Members) or,
newsorg.txt (Many of the “anchor” news folks have their email address here
for you to use) or,
rephouse.txt (Republican House of Representatives Members) or,
repubsen.txt (Republican Senate Members) or,
senators.txt (All Senators).
Step 8. After selecting the group to receive your message then click on
send batch. It will go to everyone listed in the batch.
Remember: Nothing beats a letter AND a phone call.
A Chester L McWhorter Sr, 504 N. Brighton Rd, Lecanto, Florida. 34461. Ph:
352-344-9073. Fax: 352-344-9073. E-mail: robertthebruce@naturecoast.net
36 of 39… 100.1.5.1.0 End.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment