Vatic Note: This is up, not only for the interest it should generate, but to show the extensive reach and power of the international bankers. Before we begin, lets ask ourselves some questions. One, how did Goldman sachs get the business of the country of China? How long have they been ensconsed there? Nixon and Kissinger were the ones that opened China up to those brokerage houses and they have been in there ever since. In fact it was mostly Goldman sachs and only recently is Jamie Diamond of JP Morgan, making a move to enter that market. All of them are Zionists whose Rothschld masters have been involved in overthrows of governments.
Now, what has that meant for the United States? Who runs our Treasurey dept and the federal reserve??? Goldman Sachs. Who incurred the debt and FOUND A LENDER FOR OUR DEBT? Goldman Sachs through China! Who can now claim against the US taking our property etc? China! Who got bailed out to the tune of trillions of dollars so that we became broke and severly in debt and is in the process of destroying our economy?? Goldman Sachs! Who owns Goldman Sachs? Rothschild. Before they could do that, they had to infiltrate the governmental structure to set the conditions for the revolt and subsequent new governments.
So, in China we have the head man of the worlds second largest bank as a graduate of Oxford in Britain, which is also the graduating school of Bill Clinton. He then went to yale for his final training for the New World order. So all that I describe here was done under the head of the bank of China and Goldman sachs for the many years they have been there. Like fools we complied with the debt demands of Goldman Sachs and China, working hand in hand with Goldman Sachs complied as well by giving us that debt with a great big smile.
So Oxford is America's equivalent of Harvard or Yale. Remember, Britain (under the Windsors controlled by the Rothschilds) is the country that created the middle east countries back in the post WW I era and gave them the oil countries. Then in WW II, they were instrumental in creating the state of Israel. So all the pawns were put in place. Read our Blogs on the Windsors. Its an education you will not regret. You can read them here, here, here, here, and here. To make this short, (too late, lol) China is to the bankers what America was. Now they will do to China over the next 70 or so years what they did here. Bust and boom manipulation of their economy. The pawns are in place. They already have slave labor and now they just need the western world to come down to that level in the labor force and both countries then will be similar for purposes of globalizing. China is half way there now.
Once Globalized, the bankers can bust and boom the entire globe at will and we won't complain because they will control the food, water and air we breathe to ensure our compliance JUST LIKE CHINA. Now this article shows the bankers have convinced the leadership to give the people who are slaves, the impression they are free. Its critical to their success as they did to us. Democracy is controlled through money in elections, by those same bankers.... that is why the ILLUSION of freedom is so important. Even today with all the repression and violations of our Constitution that are blatant and everyone can see it, many of our people are still under the false impression we are free. See how it works??? Its quite brilliant.
You can thank the Tavistock group of Britain for that piece of mass psychology genius. Its what they are in the process of doing in China with the complicity of their leaders. Read it below and see if you can pick it up. The only corruption being prosecuted is that which is not under the bankers control. Sound familiar??? Yet, listen to the tone of the article and you would think things are going great for freedom in China, but then they don't tell you if there is spying, who controls the net? Why did they allow it if it would not work for them? Etc etc etc. Lots of questions. Last Question is "Who is running this world?"
That includes China.... whether they know it or not! They best watch how this plays out so they can be prepared when its their turn to pour their lifes blood into the British Rothschild coffers on their journey to reclaiming their empire. .
Can microblogs change China's rulers?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14422581
7 August 2011
By Michael Bristow BBC News, Beijing
China's rulers are being urged to ditch Communist cliches and master the art of web-speak The Communist Party has urged its members to reach out to the public by using microblogging websites - but can the party cadres master the art of web speak? Microblogs are wildly popular in China. There are tens of millions of users. People are expressing themselves like never before, and there is a lot of criticism of the government.
A recent high-speed train crash in Wenzhou, where 40 people were killed, is the latest example of an incident that has provoked a huge response on the web.
People flooded microblog and other internet sites with messages critical of the government for letting the accident happen, and for its response to the disaster.
"I'm going to take a high-speed train back to Beijing. My friends all say I'm heading for death. Please bless me," was just one recent comment on Sina Weibo, one of the most popular microblog sites. Last week, a commentary piece in the People's Daily, the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, called for officials to communicate with the public through microblogs in an attempt to better understand the people it rules.
"It is hoped that there will be more and more leading cadres who are adept in speaking and are popular on the internet and microblogging sites," said the piece.
Actions must follow
In a country where free speech is severely limited, microblogs - and the internet in general - have become an important channel of expression. The web is changing the way the government relates to its people.
In public, Chinese leaders mostly talk in official-speak; language that is often heavy on cliches and light on meaning.
As the People's Daily article put it: "The language environment of the grassroots, with its special characteristics, is different from that of the [Communist] party and government officials."
The article goes on to give officials advice on how to tweet: "Only by abandoning bureaucratic or empty talk can one's microblog messages resonate with the public."
Established media outlets - newspapers, magazines and TV programmes - are all heavily censored in China. That is why the internet has given Chinese people the chance to express themselves in a public forum like never before. Even the compensation claim form being handed out to the families of victims of the rail crash was posted on a microblog site.
These new ways of communicating - there are 480 million internet users in China
(VN: That is more than the entire population of the United States) - are proving to be a challenge for China's unelected leaders. For perhaps the first time, people have a tool to tell the government exactly what they think. It was a topic of debate at a recent lecture at Beijing's Communist Party school, where senior party members are given training.
"The spread of the internet and hundreds of millions of web users means the government will lose credibility if it can't meet the public's demands," said lecturer Wang Yukai. That is the main issue: the government has to address people's grievances - not simply learn how to talk to them through microblog sites.
The central government seems to understand that point, said Mr Wang. "That's why it is cracking down on corruption, demanding officials understand people's needs and allowing more information to be released," he said.
A few days ago the State Council, the Chinese government's highest decision-making body, issued a notice calling on officials to "make more efforts to ensure transparency in government affairs".
Microblogs and the internet have not changed the fundamental nature of government in China, but they are forcing officials to change the way they operate.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment